Integrated Learning

New learning rarely stands on its own. It needs something underneath it, a layer of what a person already knows, so the fresh material has somewhere to attach. When someone can tie a new subject to things already familiar, understanding comes faster and the information tends to stick. A good teacher has a knack for building those connections, pulling what students already carry in their heads into whatever is being introduced.

Knowing a subject and being able to hand it off to someone else are two separate skills. A teacher has to own the material, yes, but owning it does nothing if there's no way to move it across to the people sitting in the room.

I watched this gap play out firsthand. There was a professor with a serious reputation in her field, someone whose research had broken ground, and she simply could not get that knowledge into her students in any way that landed. This was an advanced graduate course. Everyone in it had finished at the top of their undergraduate class and was handling the demands of graduate study without trouble.

She gave a test, and not one of these carefully selected students produced the answers she was looking for. She was surprised enough to keep the whole class behind afterward so she could walk through the entire exam and lay out the responses she had assumed they'd give.

Here's what she never figured out. The students had been quietly meeting on their own, pooling their notes to reconstruct the answers to questions she raised in lectures and believed she had resolved in class. Each session she taught left them more lost than the one before. Given that, their performance on the test makes perfect sense. The subject lived in her head. Getting it out and into theirs was something she couldn't do.

Related